News

Bribery Act - First conviction under the Corporate Offence

Sweett Group Plc has become the first corporate conviction under the Bribery Act 2010 for failing to prevent bribery.

Sweett Group, a construction and professional services company, pleaded guilty in December 2015 to a charge of failing to prevent an act of bribery committed by its subsidiary, Cyril Sweett International Limited. That act of bribery had been intended to secure and retain a contract with Al Ain Ahlia Insurance Company for the building of the Rotana Hotel in Abu Dhabi. The conviction cost Sweett Group Plc £2.25 million, made up of a £1,400,000 fine and £851,152 confiscation order. In addition £95,031 of costs were awarded to the Serious Fraud Office.

A commercial organisation is guilty of an offence if a person associated with it bribes another person to obtain or retain business or other advantage for that organisation (known as the “corporate offence” of failing to prevent bribery). A person is associated with a commercial organisation if he/she/it performs services for or on behalf of the organisation. This includes agents, employees, subsidiaries, intermediaries, joint venture partners and suppliers. The consequences of being convicted of a bribery offence are considerable with individuals liable to a jail sentence of up to 10 years and/or an unlimited fine. Commercial organisations face unlimited fines. Particular risk areas for commercial organisations include public procurement, corporate hospitality and gifts and facilitation payments.

A commercial organisation has a defence to a claim for failing to prevent bribery if it has adequate procedures in place to prevent bribery. Guidance from the Ministry of Justice sets out six principles for commercial organisations to consider in relation to adequate procedures:

  • Proportionate procedures;
  • Top level commitment;
  • Risk assessment;
  • Due diligence;
  • Communication (including training);
  • Monitoring and review.
Practical examples of the adoption of the principles set out in the Guidance include:
  • Conducting a complete risk assessment of the commercial organisation and any other companies in the group;
  • Conducting a review of anti­corruption policies and procedures;
  • Reviewing the commercial organisation’s employee code of conduct;
  • Conducting due diligence on all individuals and entities who could be considered an associated person;
  • Appointing a compliance officer;
  • Publishing an anti­corruption statement and displaying the anti­corruption policies to ensure that they are accessible by all.

Posted on 03/28/2016 by Ortolan

Get in Touch

If you would like to know more about Ortolan Legal and how we can help you reduce your ongoing recruitment costs, get in touch!

Email us now

   Or call 020 3743 0600

I have worked with Ortolan Legal since 2010 and used their services extensively. They have provided corporate and commercial legal advice and we have also drawn on their capability in the areas of employment law, dispute resolution and property law. What makes them so different is their ability consistently to deliver commercially focussed and high quality advice at a price point which simply cannot be matched by other law firms. They aim to strip out unnecessary overhead costs, concentrate on the quality of their core service and pass on these cost savings to their clients. It works.

Charlie Blackburn, Entrepreneur and co-founder of Brighttalk
See All
Receive news & updates from Ortolan Legal

Meet the Team

  • Nick Benson Nick Benson I qualified as a commercial and corporate solicitor…
  • Liz Delgado Liz Delgado I qualified as a solicitor in 1995 after studying…
  • Carrie Beaumont Carrie Beaumont I qualified as an Employment specialist in 2008. I…