News

Tenant Not Entitled To A Refund - Break date between rent payment dates

Last month the Supreme Court gave judgments that will not please commercial tenants.

In the past, if a tenant successfully exercises a break clause in its lease, the landlord will not usually be obliged to refund to the tenant any rent paid in advance for the period after the date that the lease terminates, unless the lease expressly requires the landlord to do so. Prior to the recent Marks & Spencer decision, many tenants considered that a landlord should refund any such advance rent paid as a matter of fairness, if not legal entitlement.The M&S decision makes it clear that, although the application of relevant legal principles may be unfair prejudice to the tenant or a windfall for the landlord, such consequences are not likely to be sufficient to force the landlord to make a refund.

In this case the Supreme Court found in favour of the landlord, dismissing the tenant's appeal of the Court of Appeal decision.

The facts of the case are that M&S had exercised a break clause, ending the lease early. M&S sought a refund of parts of payments it had made in advance in respect of rent, service charge, car parking licence fee and insurance charges relating to the period after the break date.

The Supreme Court, agreeing with the Court of Appeal, ruled that it was not appropriate to imply a term into the lease that entitled M&S to a refund of the rent, car parking licence fee and insurance charges although it was entitled to a refund in relation to the service charge in accordance with an express term of the lease.

It is also pleasing to note that the law lords approved the Court of Appeal decision in Ellis v Rowbotham [1900] 1 QB 740. In Ellis, the Court of Appeal held that the Apportionment Act 1870 did not apply to rents payable in advance, only those payable in arrears.

This decision has been eagerly anticipated and will be welcomed by landlords as it provides clarity and certainty.

Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Limited and another [2015].

Posted on 01/04/2016 by Ortolan

Get in Touch

If you would like to know more about Ortolan Legal and how we can help you reduce your ongoing recruitment costs, get in touch!

Email us now

   Or call 020 3743 0600

Ortolan Legal have supported us with some very tricky tribunal issues. They are very commercially focussed and truly understand our business. They give really commercial, practical advice which supports our business.

Sharon Eley, Shared Services Director, National Car Parks Limited
See All
Receive news & updates from Ortolan Legal

Meet the Team

  • Nick Benson Nick Benson I qualified as a commercial and corporate solicitor…
  • Liz Delgado Liz Delgado I qualified as a solicitor in 1995 after studying…
  • Carrie Beaumont Carrie Beaumont I qualified as an Employment specialist in 2008. I…