News

Do Heads of Terms create a binding agreement between parties?

Case

Pretoria Energy Company (Chittering) Limited v Blankney Estates Limited.

Background

Energy company Pretoria wished to take a lease of Blankney’s land. The Court of Appeal was asked to determine whether a signed document marked “Heads of Terms” but not marked “subject to contract” created a contractually binding agreement for lease.

The Heads of Terms set out various basic terms under the heading “Lease”. The property was described, the rent, the lease term, and the fact that the lease would be contracted out of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954. In addition, the Heads of Terms included a lockout provision that stipulated an exclusivity period for negotiations. It also stated that a formal contract would be drawn up within a month of planning consent having been obtained.

Pretoria’s position was that the Heads of Terms document imposed a contractual obligation on Blankney to grant a lease of the site. When Blankney refused, Pretoria brought a claim for breach of contact.

Decision

Both the High Court and the Court of Appeal held that the parties had not entered into a binding agreement for lease.

Reasons

On an objective assessment, there was no contractual obligation on the parties to enter into a lease.

The following points were relevant:

·       Although not labelled “subject to contract”, it was held to be significant that the document stated that a formal contract would be drawn up.

·       The fact that the Heads of Terms referred to a lease being granted outside of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 indicated that there was no intention to enter into a binding agreement for lease because there are formalities to be fulfilled before a lease can be excluded from the Act.

·       The lockout provision in the Heads of Terms, which provided for an exclusive negotiating period, was also deemed incompatible with there being a binding agreement.

Takeaway

It is prudent to label Heads of Terms ‘subject to contract’ to make it clear that the parties do not intend to be contractually bound, and to avoid any ambiguity but not critcal!

Posted on 07/13/2023 by Ortolan

Get in Touch

If you would like to know more about Ortolan Legal and how we can help you reduce your ongoing recruitment costs, get in touch!

Email us now

   Or call 020 3743 0600

Ortolan Legal have supported us with some very tricky tribunal issues. They are very commercially focussed and truly understand our business. They give really commercial, practical advice which supports our business.

Sharon Eley, Shared Services Director, National Car Parks Limited
See All
Receive news & updates from Ortolan Legal

Meet the Team

  • Nick Benson Nick Benson I qualified as a commercial and corporate solicitor…
  • Liz Delgado Liz Delgado I qualified as a solicitor in 1995 after studying…
  • Carrie Beaumont Carrie Beaumont I qualified as an Employment specialist in 2008. I…